Book chapter
Electoral Systems and Conflict in Divided Societies
International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War, pp.420-482
National Academy Press
2000
Abstract
This work examines whether the choice of an electoral system in a culturally plural society can affect the potential for future violent conflict. We find that it can, but that there is no single electoral system that is likely to be best for all divided societies. We distinguish four basic strategies of electoral system design. The optimal choice for peacefully managing conflict depends on several identifiable factors specific to the country, including the way and degree to which ethnicity is politicized, the intensity of conflict, and the demographic and geographic distribution of ethnic groups. In addition, the electoral system that is most appropriate for initially ending internal conflict may not be the best one for longer-term conflict management. In short, while electoral systems can be powerful levers for shaping the content and practice of politics in divided societies, their design is highly sensitive to context. Consideration of the relationship between these variables and the operation of different electoral systems enables the development of contingent generalizations that can assist policy makers in the field of electoral system design.
Details
- Title
- Electoral Systems and Conflict in Divided Societies
- Authors/Creators
- B. Reilly (Author/Creator)A. Reynolds (Author/Creator)
- Contributors
- Paul C. Stern (Editor)Daniel Druckman, (Editor)
- Publication Details
- International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War, pp.420-482
- Publisher
- National Academy Press; Washington DC, USA
- Identifiers
- 991005542837407891
- Copyright
- (c) 2000 National Academy Press
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Sir Walter Murdoch School of Public Policy and International Affairs
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Book chapter
Metrics
78 Record Views