Logo image
Solving Collective Action Problems? We-reasoning as Moral Deliberation Vol. 1
Book chapter   Open access   Peer reviewed

Solving Collective Action Problems? We-reasoning as Moral Deliberation Vol. 1

Anne Schwenkenbecher
Studies in the Ethics of Coordination and Climate Change, Vol.1, pp.173-192
Working Papers. Institute for Future Studies, 2024:8, Institute for Futures Studies
2024
pdf
Published178.55 kBDownloadView
Open Access

Abstract

Ethical theory Applied ethics Political theory and political philosophy Social theory
We-reasoning as Moral Deliberation Moral agents facing collective-action problems regularly encounter a conundrum: together, we can effect change whereas, individually, we are inefficacious. Further, what appears individually rational can be collectively suboptimal. An individual agent may employ different types of reasoning in deciding how to act vis-à-vis such problems. Reasoning in the I-mode, she takes her individual agency and efficacy in the world as the starting point: What is the best thing she can do given the circumstance and given what others do? It is act-based, best-response reasoning. The preferences of agents deliberating in the I-mode may well be other-regarding: e.g. they may aim at furthering the group's interest or collective good. We-mode reasoning, or ʻwe-reasoningʼ, in contrast, is pattern-based: we infer our course of action from what is collectively best by way of acting as part of the group rather than for the sake of the group. I-mode reasoning with pro-group preferences (pro-group I-mode reasoning) and we-reasoning will often generate the same result, in particular in so-called strict joint necessity cases – where each agent's contribution is necessary for realizing a specific collectively available option. I-mode reasoning will regularly generate socially suboptimal results in so-called wide joint necessity cases – such as voting or carbon footprint reductions. Moral deliberating agents use both kinds of reasoning and contextual factors seem to function as important triggers. But can we-reasoning help us determine our moral obligations vis-à-vis collective action problems?

Details

Metrics

13 File views/ downloads
55 Record Views
Logo image