Files and links (1)
Published (Version of Record)CC BY-SA V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
1790: Kres Prawdy w interpretacji złożonych kontekstów
ER(R)GO, Vol.48, pp.311-330
2024
Abstract
The paper argues that the standard pro- and anti-Kantian reception of the Critique of Judgment has largely misconstrued the relationship between Part I and Part II of the book by failing to recognize that the former is primarily providing a series of stepping-stones laying the groundwork for the elaboration of reflective-teleological reasoning in Part II. Instead of its dominant reading as foremost relevant to the study of biological nature, the paper distils from the reflective-teleological judgment a universal principle by which we typically interpret any complex set of particulars. As such, the reflective-teleological judgment of 1790 is shown to have done away with interpretive truth, replaced by Kant with the more modest claim of intelligibility.
Details
- Title
- 1790: Kres Prawdy w interpretacji złożonych kontekstów
- Publication Details
- ER(R)GO, Vol.48, pp.311-330
- Publisher
- Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
- Identifiers
- 991005703767807891
- Copyright
- Copyright 2020 Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach, Polska
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
- Language
- English; Polish
- Resource Type
- Journal article
Metrics
20 Record Views