Logo image
A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis

K.M. Ho, G.J. Dobb and S.A.R. Webb
Intensive Care Medicine, Vol.32(5), pp.639-649
2006
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential beneficial and adverse effects of early post-pyloric feeding compared with gastric feeding in critically ill adult patients with no evidence of impaired gastric emptying. Design: Randomised controlled studies comparing gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill adult patients from Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (2005 issue 3), EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (1966 to 1 October 2005) without any language restriction were included. Two reviewers reviewed the quality of the studies and performed data extraction independently. Measurements and results: Eleven randomised controlled studies with a total of 637 critically ill adult patients were considered. The mortality (relative risk [RR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.76-1.36, p = 0.93; I2 = 0%) and risk of aspiration or pneumonia (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.91-1.80, p = 0.15; I2 = 0%) were not significantly different between patients treated with gastric or post-pyloric feeding. The effect of post-pyloric feeding on the risk of pneumonia or aspiration was similar when studies were stratified into those with and those without the use of concurrent gastric decompression (RR ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.48-1.91, p = 0.89). The risk of diarrhoea and the length of intensive care unit stay (weighted mean difference in days -1.46, 95% CI -3.74 to 0.82, p = 0.21; I2 = 24.6%) were not statistically different. The gastric feeding group had a much lower risk of experiencing feeding tube placement difficulties or blockage (0 vs 9.6%, RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.44, p = 0.001; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Early use of post-pyloric feeding instead of gastric feeding in critically ill adult patients with no evidence of impaired gastric emptying was not associated with significant clinical benefits.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.249 Digestive System Disorders
1.249.1374 Enteral Nutrition
Web Of Science research areas
Critical Care Medicine
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image