Logo image
A comparison of rural educational disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using OECD’s PISA
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A comparison of rural educational disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using OECD’s PISA

K. Sullivan, A. McConney and L.B. Perry
SAGE Open, Vol.8(4)
2018
pdf
rural education.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

This study compares rural educational disadvantage across Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Across the three countries, student reading literacy and school learning environments are less positive in rural communities than in urban. Furthermore, rural disadvantage in educational outcomes (reading) and opportunities is greater in Australia than Canada or New Zealand. This could be seen as surprising as student socioeconomic status (SES), typically a strong predictor of educational outcomes, is similar for rural communities in Australia and Canada, but lower in New Zealand. Rural school principals in Australia are most likely among the three countries to report that shortages of teaching personnel hinder learning. This could suggest that policies and structures can play a role in ameliorating or exacerbating rural educational disadvantage. We conclude with questions and recommendations for future research.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Metrics

253 File views/ downloads
243 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.11 Education & Educational Research
6.11.345 Educational Reform
Web Of Science research areas
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image