Logo image
A comparison of the L2 minimum distance estimator and the EM-algorithm when fitting k-component univariate normal mixtures
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A comparison of the L2 minimum distance estimator and the EM-algorithm when fitting k-component univariate normal mixtures

B.R. Clarke, T. Davidson and R. Hammarstrand
Statistical Papers, Vol.58(4), pp.1247-1266
2017
pdf
k-component univariate normal mixtures.pdfDownloadView
Author’s Version Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The method of maximum likelihood using the EM-algorithm for fitting finite mixtures of normal distributions is the accepted method of estimation ever since it has been shown to be superior to the method of moments. Recent books testify to this. There has however been criticism of the method of maximum likelihood for this problem, the main criticism being when the variances of component distributions are unequal the likelihood is in fact unbounded and there can be multiple local maxima. Another major criticism is that the maximum likelihood estimator is not robust. Several alternative minimum distance estimators have since been proposed as a way of dealing with the first problem. This paper deals with one of these estimators which is not only superior due to its robustness, but in fact can have an advantage in numerical studies even at the model distribution. Importantly, robust alternatives of the EM-algorithm, ostensibly fitting t distributions when in fact the data are mixtures of normals, are also not competitive at the normal mixture model when compared to the chosen minimum distance estimator. It is argued for instance that natural processes should lead to mixtures whose component distributions are normal as a result of the Central Limit Theorem. On the other hand data can be contaminated because of extraneous sources as are typically assumed in robustness studies. This calls for a robust estimator

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

129 File views/ downloads
187 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
9 Mathematics
9.92 Statistical Methods
9.92.220 Robust Estimation
Web Of Science research areas
Statistics & Probability
ESI research areas
Mathematics
Logo image