Logo image
Back
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing transparent polyurethane and hydrocolloid dressings for central venous catheters
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing transparent polyurethane and hydrocolloid dressings for central venous catheters

S. Nikoletti, G. Leslie, S. Gandossi, G. Coombs and R. Wilson
American Journal of Infection Control, Vol.27(6), pp.488-496
1999
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70026-X
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Background: This study was undertaken to determine the frequency of skin colonization, hub colonization, and central venous catheter colonization in transparent hydrocolloid versus standard polyurethane dressings. Methods: Adult patients requiring the insertion of a multilumen central venous catheter in an intensive care unit were randomized to receive either a standard polyurethane dressing or a transparent hydrocolloid dressing. Cultures were obtained from 125 skin insertion sites, 141 catheter hubs, 128 catheter tips, and blood samples from 132 patients. Extensive data on patient and catheter characteristics were collected. Results: Skin and hub cultures revealed no significant difference in degree of colonization. However, the hydrocolloid group had a significantly higher level of catheter colonization than the polyurethane group (P = .048). Conversely, there was a significantly higher frequency of positive blood cultures in the polyurethane group (P = .03), although the majority were considered to be potential contaminants. There were only 6 cases in which the same species was simultaneously isolated from a positive blood culture and a colonized catheter, 5 from the hydrocolloid group and I from the polyurethane group. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that an increased risk of catheter colonization is associated with the use of hydrocolloid dressings, despite previous research suggesting that they significantly reduce microbial growth compared with standard polyurethane. The clinical significance of increased numbers of positive blood cultures in the polyurethane group requires further examination, although distinguishing between contamination and true infection in intensive care settings continues to be methodologically challenging. Further studies are required to determine whether these findings are generalizable across different study settings and whether similar outcomes are obtained when different brands of hydrocolloid dressing are used.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

58 Record Views
20 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.168 Vascular, Cardiac & Thoracic Surgery
1.168.671 Vascular Access
Web Of Science research areas
Infectious Diseases
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
ESI research areas
Immunology
Logo image