Logo image
A single subject, feasibility study of using a non-contact measurement to “visualize” temperature at body-seat interface
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A single subject, feasibility study of using a non-contact measurement to “visualize” temperature at body-seat interface

Z. Liu, V. Cascioli and P.W. McCarthy
Sensors, Vol.22(10), Article 3941
2022
pdf
Visualize.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

Measuring temperature changes at the body-seat interface has been drawing increased attention from both industrial and scientific fields, due to the increasingly sedentary nature from daily leisure activity to routine work. Although contact measurement is considered the gold standard, it can affect the local micro-environment and the perception of sitting comfort. A non-contact temperature measurement system was developed to determine the interface temperature using data gathered unobtrusively and continuously from an infrared sensor (IRs). System performance was evaluated regarding linearity, hysteresis, reliability and accuracy. Then a healthy participant sat for an hour on low/intermediate density foams with thickness varying from 0.5–8 cm while body-seat interface temperature was measured simultaneously using a temperature sensor (contact) and an IRs (non-contact). IRs data were filtered with empirical mode decomposition and fractal scaling indices before a data-driven artificial neural network was utilized to estimate the contact surface temperature. A strong correlation existed between non-contact and contact temperature measurement (ρ > 0.85) and the estimation results showed a low root mean square error (RMSE) (<0.07 for low density foam and <0.16 for intermediate density foam) and high Nash-Sutcliff efficiency (NSE) values (≈1 for both types of foam materials).

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

67 File views/ downloads
90 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.266 Wounds & Ulcers
1.266.1068 Pressure Ulcer
Web Of Science research areas
Chemistry, Analytical
Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
Instruments & Instrumentation
ESI research areas
Chemistry
Logo image