Logo image
Academic domains as political battlegrounds: a global enquiry by 99 academics in the fields of education and technology
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Academic domains as political battlegrounds: a global enquiry by 99 academics in the fields of education and technology

A.E. Al Lily, J. Foland, D. Stoloff, A. Gogus, I.D. Erguvan, M.T. Awshar, J. Tondeur, M. Hammond, I.M. Venter, P. Jerry, …
Information Development, Vol.33(3), pp.270-288
2017
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

This article theorizes the functional relationship between the human components (i.e., scholars) and non-human components (i.e., structural configurations) of academic domains. It is organized around the following question: in what ways have scholars formed and been formed by the structural configurations of their academic domain? The article uses as a case study the academic domain of education and technology to examine this question. Its authorship approach is innovative, with a worldwide collection of academics (99 authors) collaborating to address the proposed question based on their reflections on daily social and academic practices. This collaboration followed a three-round process of contributions via email. Analysis of these scholars’ reflective accounts was carried out, and a theoretical proposition was established from this analysis. The proposition is of a mutual (yet not necessarily balanced) power (and therefore political) relationship between the human and non-human constituents of an academic realm, with the two shaping one another. One implication of this proposition is that these non-human elements exist as political ‘actors’, just like their human counterparts, having ‘agency’ – which they exercise over humans. This turns academic domains into political (functional or dysfunctional) ‘battlefields’ wherein both humans and non-humans engage in political activities and actions that form the identity of the academic domain. For more information about the authorship approach, please see Al Lily AEA (2015) A crowd-authoring project on the scholarship of educational technology. Information Development.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.3 Management
6.3.368 Technology Acceptance Model
Web Of Science research areas
Information Science & Library Science
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image