Logo image
Back
Acute physiological responses to low-intensity blood flow restriction cycling
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Acute physiological responses to low-intensity blood flow restriction cycling

H.J. Thomas, B.R. Scott and J.J. Peiffer
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol.21(9), pp.969-974
2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.013
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Objectives Blood flow restriction (BFR) during interval cycling may stimulate aerobic and anaerobic adaptations. However, acute physiological responses to BFR interval cycling have not been extensively investigated. Design Eighteen males completed low-intensity (LI), low-intensity with BFR (LIBFR) and high-intensity (HI) interval cycling sessions in randomised and counterbalanced order. These included a standardised warm-up and three two-min intervals interspersed with two-min recovery. Interval intensity during HI, LI and LIBFR were 85%, 40% and 40% of peak power output obtained during graded exercise tests. Methods During LIBFR, 80% arterial occlusion was applied to both legs during the interval efforts and removed during recovery. Continuous measures of heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO) and oxygen consumption (View the MathML sourceV˙O2) were recorded. Blood pressure (BP) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured following intervals. Blood lactate concentration was measured pre- and post-exercise. Results BP, HR, CO, View the MathML sourceV˙O2, lactate and RPE were greatest during HI. During the active intervals, BP, HR and CO were greater during LIBFR than LI. View the MathML sourceV˙O2 during recovery periods were greater in LIBFR than LI. Post-session lactate was greater during LIBFR than LI. Importantly, mean arterial pressure during interval three was significantly greater in LIBFR (124 ± 2 mmHg) than HI (114 ± 3 mmHg). Conclusions LIBFR increases cardiovascular and metabolic stress compared with LI and could provide an alternative aerobic training method for individuals unable to perform high-intensity exercise. However, increases in mean arterial pressure during LIBFR indicates high myocardial workload, and practitioners should therefore use caution if prescribing LIBFR for vascular compromised individuals.

Details

Metrics

55 Record Views
48 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.172 Sports Science
1.172.414 Training Optimization
Web Of Science research areas
Sport Sciences
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image