Files and links (1)
CC BY V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
Adaptable Automation Transparency: Should Humans Be Provided Flexibility to Self-Select Transparency Information?
Human factors, Online First
2025
PMID: 40518769
Abstract
Objective
We examined whether allowing operators to self-select automation transparency level (adaptable transparency) could improve accuracy of automation use compared to nonadaptable (fixed) low and high transparency. We examined factors underlying higher transparency selection (decision risk, perceived difficulty).
Background
Increased fixed transparency typically improves automation use accuracy but can increase bias toward agreeing with automated advice. Adaptable transparency may further improve automation use if it increases the perceived expected value of high transparency information.
Methods
Across two studies, participants completed an uninhabited vehicle (UV) management task where they selected the optimal UV to complete missions. Automation advised the optimal UV but was not always correct. Automation transparency (fixed low, fixed high, adaptable) and decision risk were manipulated within-subjects.
Results
With adaptable transparency, participants selected higher transparency on 41% of missions and were more likely to select it for missions perceived as more difficult. Decision risk did not impact transparency selection. Increased fixed transparency (low to high) did not benefit automation use accuracy, but reduced decision times. Adaptable transparency did not improve automation use compared to fixed transparency.
Conclusion
We found no evidence that adaptable transparency improved automation use. Despite a lack of fixed transparency effects in the current study, an aggregated analysis of our work to date using the UV management paradigm indicated that higher fixed transparency improves automation use accuracy, reduces decision time and perceived workload, and increases trust in automation.
Application
The current study contributes to the emerging evidence-base regarding optimal automation transparency design in the modern workplace.
Details
- Title
- Adaptable Automation Transparency: Should Humans Be Provided Flexibility to Self-Select Transparency Information?
- Authors/Creators
- Monica Tatasciore - The University of Western Australia, AustraliaLaura Bennett - The University of Western Australia, AustraliaVanessa K Bowden - The University of Western Australia, AustraliaJason Bell - The University of Western Australia, AustraliaTroy A W Visser - The University of Western Australia, AustraliaKen McAnally - University of Queensland, AustraliaJason S McCarley - Oregon State UniversityMatthew B Thompson - Murdoch UniversityChristopher Shanahan - Defence Science and Technology GroupRobert Morris - Defence Science and Technology GroupShayne Loft - The University of Western Australia, Australia
- Publication Details
- Human factors, Online First
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications; THOUSAND OAKS
- Number of pages
- 23
- Identifiers
- 991005787875207891
- Copyright
- © 2025 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Centre for Biosecurity and One Health
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
Metrics
2 File views/ downloads
8 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 4 Electrical Engineering, Electronics & Computer Science
- 4.237 Safety & Maintenance
- 4.237.1238 Situation Awareness
- Web Of Science research areas
- Behavioral Sciences
- Engineering, Industrial
- Ergonomics
- Psychology
- Psychology, Applied
- ESI research areas
- Psychiatry/Psychology