Logo image
Analytical quality control in targeted lipidomics: Evaluating the performance of commercial plasma as a surrogate for pooled study samples
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Analytical quality control in targeted lipidomics: Evaluating the performance of commercial plasma as a surrogate for pooled study samples

Alanah Grant-St James, Aude-Claire Lee, Alex J. Lee, Julien Wist, Ferdous Sohel, Kok Wai Wong, Bu B. Yeap, Ruey Leng Loo, Amanda Henry, Daniella Susic, …
Analytica chimica acta, Vol.1365, 344225
2025
pdf
Published7.18 MBDownloadView
CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

analytical variation Data pre-processing Long-term reference (LTR) Pooled quality control (PQC) Surrogate quality control (sQC) Targeted lipidomics Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS)
Pooled quality control (PQC) samples are the gold standard for data quality monitoring in metabolic phenotyping studies. Typically composed of equal parts from all study samples, PQCs can be challenging to generate in large cohorts or when sample volumes are low. As an alternative, externally sourced matrix-matched surrogate QCs (sQC) have been proposed. This study evaluates the performance of sQCs against PQCs for assessing analytical variation, data pre-processing, and downstream data analysis in a targeted lipidomics workflow. Plasma samples (n = 701) from the Microbiome Understanding in Maternity Study, along with PQC (n = 80) and sQC (n = 80) samples, were analyzed using a lipidomics assay targeting 1162 lipids. QC samples were injected throughout acquisition, and data pre-processing was performed using each strategy. For simplicity, a subset (n = 381) of the study samples was used to assess differences in downstream statistical analyses. Both QC approaches demonstrated high analytical repeatability. While PQC and sQC compositions differed, use of PQCs retained less than 4 % more lipid species during pre-processing. Univariate analysis identified more statistically significant lipids with PQC-based pre-processing, but multivariate model performance was similar between datasets. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of QC strategies and emphasizes the importance of careful QC workflow selection. While PQCs offer advantages, sQCs serve as a suitable alternative for quality assessment and pre-processing. Their commercial availability also supports use as intra- and inter-laboratory long-term references, aiding data harmonization across studies and laboratories. [Display omitted] •Comparison of two quality control workflows; pooled study and surrogate QC samples.•In-depth assessment of lipid composition, precision, and filtering.•OPLS-DA model predictive power maintained with both QC pre-processing strategies.•Surrogate QC samples are a robust alternative to a pooled QC in targeted lipidomics.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

20 File views/ downloads
24 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
2 Chemistry
2.211 Mass Spectrometry
2.211.990 Metabolomics
Web Of Science research areas
Chemistry, Analytical
ESI research areas
Chemistry
Logo image