Logo image
Appropriate modelling of school compositional effects: A response to Malatinszky and Armor, and Marks
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Appropriate modelling of school compositional effects: A response to Malatinszky and Armor, and Marks

M. Sciffer, L. Perry and A. McConney
British Journal of Sociology of Education
2021
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

We respond to Malatinszky and Armor’s, and Marks’ comments on our article recently published in this journal. We agree with Marks in the use of prior achievement to control for spurious effects in school effects research. Marks makes an incorrect statement about our article, refers to dated critiques, and presents an empirical demonstration with some problems. We agree with Malatinszky and Armor that school composition may have sufficient within-student variation to detect a potential effect on achievement growth in fixed-effects models. We argue that fixed-effects models exclude most of the variation in socioeconomic composition, are incapable of measuring the commonly defined conceptualisation of school composition and can mischaracterise the relative importance of socioeconomic composition.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#10 Reduced Inequalities

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.11 Education & Educational Research
6.11.345 Educational Reform
Web Of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research
Sociology
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image