Logo image
Are men treated differently in clinical placements during nursing studies? A cross-sectional study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Are men treated differently in clinical placements during nursing studies? A cross-sectional study

Yenna Salamonson, Della Maneze, Brandon W. Smith, Jed Duff, Karen A. Theobald, Jed Montayre, Lauren McTier and Frank Donnelly
Journal of clinical nursing, Vol.32(17-18), pp.6354-6365
2023
PMID: 37269058
pdf
Published1.50 MBDownloadView
CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Nursing Science & Technology
Aim and Objective To explore the perceptions of nursing students regarding the treatment of men in nursing during their clinical placement. Background Negative placement experiences of men who are nursing students is a risk factor for student attrition. Hence, exploring gender disparity in treatment during placement from both men and women studying nursing will contribute to improving student experience and reducing attrition. Design Survey capturing both quantitative and qualitative data. Methods Nursing students were surveyed between July and September 2021 across 16 Schools of Nursing in Australia. In addition to the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI-19), an open-ended question explored if men received different treatment during clinical placement. Results Those who expressed difference in treatment of men were less satisfied with their clinical learning experience (p < .001). Of the 486 (39.6%) who responded to the open-ended question, 152 (31%) indicated a difference in the treatment of men, reporting that men received: (a) better (39%); (b) different, not exclusively better or worse (19%); and (c) worse (42%) treatment from either the clinical facilitator or ward staff. While both men and women perceived gender differences in the treatment of men during placement, men were more likely to report worse treatment. Conclusion Despite the advances achieved in recruiting men in nursing, negative experiences during clinical placement are characterised by stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination, adversely impact retention. Relevance to clinical practice Nurse educators need to recognise specific support students require during placement regardless of gender. Our findings reinforce the adverse impacts of inequitable treatment on both men and women nursing students on learning, clinical performance, morale and ultimately on retention in the nursing workforce. Addressing gender stereotyping and discrimination in the undergraduate nursing program is an important step in promoting diversity and inclusivity in the nursing workforce.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.14 Nursing
1.14.265 Nursing Education
Web Of Science research areas
Nursing
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image