Logo image
Assessing the clinical significance of treatment outcomes for distressing voices in routine clinical practice
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Assessing the clinical significance of treatment outcomes for distressing voices in routine clinical practice

J.C. Badcock, M.E. Graham and G. Paulik
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Vol.27(1), pp.79-86
2020
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Determining reliable and clinically significant change is central to evidence‐based practice yet rarely used in routine clinical settings. This paper illustrates these methods in the context of an evaluation of cognitive behaviour therapy for distressing auditory hallucinations (“voices”). We used data from a clinical sample attending Perth Voices Clinic, a transdiagnostic outpatient service for distressing voices, and a previously published reference sample of healthy voice hearers. Our outcomes on the primary measure of voice distress, derived from a previous factor analysis of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale‐Auditory Hallucinations subscale, showed that 62.9% of clients were classified as Recovered/Improved, 35.5% were classified as Unchanged, and 0.02% were classified as Deteriorated. Partial support for the validity of these classifications was obtained from the scores on the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) but not on the Social and Occupational Functional Assessment Scale (Goldman et al., 1992). Clients classified as Recovered showed better emotional functioning on the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales compared with those who did not make a clinically significant change in voice distress. A tool is provided to assist practitioners to evaluate whether individual clients have benefited from therapy for distressing voices or not, which can be used to guide future treatment decisions (https://osf.io/gd9e5/).

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

43 readers on Mendeley

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.21 Psychiatry
1.21.24 Schizophrenia Research
Web Of Science research areas
Psychology, Clinical
ESI research areas
Psychiatry/Psychology
Logo image