Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView
Abstract
The centipede game is a two-player finite game of perfect information where a unique subgame perfect Nash equilibrium appears to be intuitively unappealing and descriptively inadequate. This paper analyzes behavior in the centipede game when a traditional game-theoretical assumption that players maximize expected utility is relaxed. We demonstrate the existence of a descriptively adequate subgame perfect equilibrium under two standard decision-theoretical assumptions. First, players choose under uncertainty in a probabilistic manner as captured by embedding a core deterministic decision theory in a model of probabilistic choice. Second, players adopt non-linear decision weights and overweight the likelihood of rare events as captured, for example, by rank-dependent utility or prospect theory.
Details
Title
Behavior in the centipede game: A decision-theoretical perspective
Authors/Creators
P. Blavatskyy (Author/Creator) - Murdoch University
Publication Details
Economics Letters, Vol.133(August), pp.117-122
Publisher
Elsevier
Identifiers
991005544263707891
Copyright
Elsevier
Murdoch Affiliation
School of Management and Governance
Language
English
Resource Type
Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals: