Logo image
Biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate combined with an intramedullary pin or a polyetheretherketone rod in a cadaveric canine tibia gap model
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate combined with an intramedullary pin or a polyetheretherketone rod in a cadaveric canine tibia gap model

L.H. Beierer, M. Glyde, R.E. Day and G.L. Hosgood
Veterinary Surgery, Vol.43(8), pp.1032-1038
2014
pdf
cadaveric_canine_tibia_gap_model.pdfDownloadView
Author’s Version Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Objective To compare the biomechanical properties of a 10-hole 3.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP) with 2 proximal and 2 distal bicortical locked screws reinforced with either a Steinmann pin of 30–40% the medullary diameter or a poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) rod of ∼75% the medullary diameter in a cadaveric tibia gap model. Study Design Ex vivo study. Sample Population Cadaveric canine tibias (n = 8 pair). Methods Each construct had a 10-hole 3.5 mm LCP with 2 screws per fracture fragment using a comminuted tibia gap model. The Steinmann pin constructs had a 2.4 mm intramedullary pin whereas the PEEK-rod constructs had a 6 mm intramedullary PEEK rod placed. Biomechanical testing included non-destructive bi-planar 4 point bending, torsion testing, and destructive axial compression. Testing produced the responses of failure load (N) in axial compression, stiffness (N/mm or N/°) in axial compression, torsion, lateral-medial, and caudal-cranial 4 point bending. Screw position within the PEEK-rods was determined after explantation. Results The PEEK-rod constructs were significantly stiffer in axial compression (P < .005), lateral-medial 4 point bending (P < .001), and in torsional loading (P < .031) than the Steinman pin constructs. There was no significant difference between the constructs for stiffness in caudal-cranial 4 point bending (P = .32). The PEEK-rod constructs failed at a significantly higher load than the Steinmann pin constructs (P < .001). All constructs failed by yielding through plastic deformation. Each screw penetrated the PEEK rod in all constructs but the position of the screw varied. Conclusion PEEK-rod constructs failed at significantly higher loads and were significantly stiffer in 4 point lateral-medial bending, axial compression, and torsion when compared with Steinmann pin constructs.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

243 File views/ downloads
84 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.34 Orthopedics
1.34.800 Fracture Management
Web Of Science research areas
Veterinary Sciences
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science
Logo image