Logo image
Blood-flow Restriction Training Does Not Increase Muscular Gains in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: 2006 Board #292 May 29, 3
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Blood-flow Restriction Training Does Not Increase Muscular Gains in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: 2006 Board #292 May 29, 3

Brandon M. Kistler, Yvonne Learmonth, Peter J. Fitschen, Ipek Ensari, Annabel Biruete, Brian M. Sandroff, Jin Hee Jeong, Robert W. Motl and Kenneth R. Wilund
Medicine and science in sports and exercise, Vol.46(5S), p.551
2014

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease that affects 1 per 1000 people in the United States. This disease is characterized by neurological abnormalities that may limit a person’s ability to perform high-load resistance training. Blood-flow restriction training, which involves the inflation of a pneumatic cuff around the proximal end of a working muscle, has resulted in muscle strength adaptations to low-load resistance training similar to high-load resistance training in healthy adults, but has not been studied in persons with MS. PURPOSE: To determine if low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction is more effective than low-load resistance training alone in improving markers of mobility disability in persons with MS. METHODS: 19 persons with MS (median EDSS score=2.5) were randomly assigned to perform a six week, progressive, low-load resistance training program (30% 1RM) with or without an inflated KAATSU mini cuff (160 mm Hg). To determine efficacy at the start and following the six-weeks of training, participants were measured for body composition (DEXA), mobility (timed 25-foot walk test, timed up-and-go), muscle strength (leg press, calf raise, leg extension, leg curl 1RM), power (peak torque), and cardiovascular health (blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, augmentation index). Data analysis involved a 2x2 ANOVA for group and time. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of time for measures of strength (leg press, calf raise, and leg curl), power (peak flexion), and mobility (p≤0.05 for all), but not lean body mass, peak leg-extension strength, and extension power (p>0.05). However, there were no significant group-by-time interactions for any measure of mobility, strength, or power (p>0.05 for all). Measures of cardiovascular health did not change significantly over time or between groups (p>0.05 for all). However, central pulse wave velocity (carotid to femoral) tended to increase with blood-flow restriction training compared to low load training alone (p=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this group suggest low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction offers no additional benefit in comparison to low-load resistance training alone in persons with MS.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.82 Gait & Posture
1.82.811 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Web Of Science research areas
Sport Sciences
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image