Logo image
Cemented Thompson versus cemented bipolar prostheses for femoral neck fractures
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Cemented Thompson versus cemented bipolar prostheses for femoral neck fractures

S. Bauer, P. Isenegger, O.P. Gautschi, K.M. Ho, P.J. Yates and R. Zellweger
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol.18(2), pp.166-171
2010
pdf
303-595-1-SM.pdf221.17 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

To compare early functional outcomes, complications, and mortality in elderly patients treated with the less costly, cemented Thompson prosthesis or the cemented bipolar prosthesis in order to identify factors affecting outcomes. Records of 303 patients with femoral neck fractures treated with the cemented Thompson monoblock prosthesis (n=206) or the cemented bipolar prosthesis (n=97) were reviewed. The choice of prosthesis was solely determined by surgeon's preference. Data relating to patient demographics, clinical and residential status, mobility, mental function, mortality, and complications during hospitalisation and rehabilitation were collected. After adjusting for confounding variables, independent postoperative indoor mobility was associated with preoperative indoor mobility (p=0.002) and mental function (p=0.001), whereas postoperative outdoor mobility was associated with preoperative outdoor mobility (p=0.003), daily living activity (p=0.02), and mental function (p=0.02). Mortality within 6 months was only associated with poor mental function (p=0.009). At 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 types of prosthesis in terms of functional outcomes, mortality and complication rates. In elderly patients with limited mobility, treatment with the bipolar prosthesis was not associated with better short-term outcomes than those receiving the Thompson prosthesis.

Details

Metrics

156 File views/ downloads
41 Record Views
Logo image