Clarifying the point: A brief response to Sharrock and Coulter

A. McHoul; M. Rapley

doi:10.1177/0959354306062539

Back

Clarifying the point: A brief response to Sharrock and Coulter

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Clarifying the point: A brief response to Sharrock and Coulter

A. McHoul and M. Rapley

Theory & Psychology, Vol.16(2), pp.277-279

2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354306062539

Files and links (2)

pdf

clarifying_the_point.pdfDownload View

Author’s Version Open Access

url

Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

This is a short response to a particular point made by our colleagues Wes Sharrock and Jeff Coulter in their otherwise convincing and devastating critique of the ‘Theory of Mind’ (ToM) avatar of cognitivism. We think they may have misunderstood what we once said about the use of ‘mental predicates’ and wish to clarify the point in question.

Details

Title: Clarifying the point: A brief response to Sharrock and Coulter
Authors/Creators: A. McHoul (Author/Creator) - Murdoch University
M. Rapley (Author/Creator) - Edith Cowan University
Publication Details: Theory & Psychology, Vol.16(2), pp.277-279
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Identifiers: 991005544316107891
Murdoch Affiliation: School of Media, Communication and Culture
Language: English
Resource Type: Journal article

Metrics

237 File views/ downloads

120 Record Views

1 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration
Citation topics: 6 Social Sciences; 6.69 Language & Linguistics; 6.69.610 Discourse Pragmatics
Web Of Science research areas: Psychology, Multidisciplinary
ESI research areas: Psychiatry/Psychology