Logo image
Comparative accuracy of two veterinary‐calibrated point‐of‐care glucometres for measurement of blood glucose concentration in dogs
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Comparative accuracy of two veterinary‐calibrated point‐of‐care glucometres for measurement of blood glucose concentration in dogs

G. Wolfenden, F.E. James, L.H.T. Hung, M. Bruce and M. Thompson
Journal of Small Animal Practice, Vol.63(7), pp.512-519
2022
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Objectives To investigate and compare the accuracy of two veterinary portable blood glucose metres (AccuTell; AccubioTech; and AlphaTrak2; Abbott Laboratories). Materials and Methods One hundred twenty venous blood samples were obtained for immediate whole blood glucose concentration measurement using two portable blood glucose metres designed for use in dogs. Plasma glucose concentration was measured by a laboratory analyser using a hexokinase reaction method. Packed cell volume was measured for each sample. Linear regression analysis was performed and Bland–Altman plots constructed with International Standards Organisation 15197:2013 standards applied to assess relationship and agreement between results of portable blood glucose metres and laboratory analyser methods, respectively. Clarke's error grid analysis was used to assess clinical accuracy and usefulness. Results The AccuTell and the AlphaTrak2 had mean differences of −0.69 ± 0.70 mmol/L (bias ±sd) and −1.09 ± 1.22 mmol/L (bias ± sd) with the reference analyser, respectively. Eighty-eight of 120 (73.3%) samples for the AccuTell, and 73 of 120 (60.8%) samples for the AlphaTrak2 were plotted in the zone of the error grid analysis that indicated less clinical risk of misdiagnosis of glucose status. Neither device fulfilled the International Standards Organisation 15197:2013 standards for system accuracy. A statistically significant effect of packed cell volume was identified on the difference between blood glucose concentration obtained by the AlphaTrak2 and the hexokinase reaction method, but not for the AccuTell. Clinical Significance Both devices do not meet International Standards Organisation 15197:2013 standards. Users should expect 95% of the samples measured with the AccuTell to be between −0.7 and +2.1 mmol/L higher than actual values, and 95% of the samples measured with the AlphaTrak2 to be between −1.3 and +3.5 mmol/L higher than actual values.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.232 Veterinary Sciences
3.232.1715 Canine Orthopedics
Web Of Science research areas
Veterinary Sciences
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science
Logo image