Logo image
Comparison of two different methods for physiologic dead space measurements in ventilated dogs in a clinical setting
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Comparison of two different methods for physiologic dead space measurements in ventilated dogs in a clinical setting

Martina Mosing, L Staub and Y Moens
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, Vol.37(5), pp.393-400
2010
PMID: 20712605

Abstract

Agriculture biology Department of Clinical Diagnostics and Services Life sciences
Objective To compare physiologic dead space (VD) and physiologic dead space to tidal volume (VT) ratio (VD/VT) obtained by an automated single breath test for carbon dioxide (CO2) (method SBT) and a manual calculation (method MC) in ventilated healthy dogs. Study design Prospective clinical study. Animals Twenty client‐owned dogs, ASA I and II undergoing anaesthesia for clinical purposes. Methods Following pre‐medication, induction of anaesthesia, and intubation of the trachea, intermittent positive pressure ventilation was commenced. Mixed expired CO2 partial pressure (PēCO2) was measured by two methods: method MC by analysis, using an infrared capnograph, of the expired gas collected in a mixing box and method SBT which calculated it automatically by a device consisting of a mainstream capnograph and a pneumotachograph. At four time points arterial partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2) was measured. Physiologic dead space variables (VD and VD/VT) were calculated manually (method MC) or automatically (method SBT) using the Bohr–Enghoff equation. Method MC and SBT were compared using Bland–Altman plots and linear regression. Intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure consistency of each method. Results Four measurement pairs were obtained in all 20 dogs for method SBT and MC. The bias was −1.15 mmHg, 7.97 mL and 0.02 for PēCO2, VD and VD/VT, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.79, 0.94, and 0.83 for PēCO2, VD and VD/VT, respectively. The ICC revealed an excellent consistency for both methods. Conclusions The single breath test (SBT) can be used for clinical evaluation of VD and VD/VT in anaesthetized ventilated dogs. Clinical relevance Through measuring VD and VD/VT important information about lung ventilation can be obtained and the SBT is an easy method to use for this purpose.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.154 Assisted Ventilation
1.154.277 Mechanical Ventilation
Web Of Science research areas
Veterinary Sciences
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science
Logo image