Journal article
Conscientious internationalisation in higher education: Contextual complexities and comparative tensions
Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol.21(4), pp.653-665
2020
Abstract
In this paper, authors focus on how internationalisation is defined, interpreted, and responded to by Universities in Australia and Canada, two decades after de Wit’s (Strategies for the internationalisation of higher education. A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the USA. European Association for International Education, Amsterdam, 1995) comparison of internationalisation in four higher education contexts. Guided by humanitarian factors that impact internationalisation in higher education contexts, authors find convergence and divergence with de Wits earlier study. A critical policy lens is employed to further analyse, probe and pose critical questions related to people, philosophy, place, processes, and power (5Ps). Authors argue that the intent (philosophy) of institutions (place) to internationalise (process) are impacted by the interests (power) of individuals and institutions (people) and these often conflict with descriptions and ideals of internationalisation. The authors offer conscientious internationalisation (CI) to recalibrate discourse and practices embedded in the internationalisation of higher education. CI prioritises ethics over markets. It is characterized as practices and processes informed by constitutive principles and ethical practices that amplify equity, reciprocity, and integrity.
Details
- Title
- Conscientious internationalisation in higher education: Contextual complexities and comparative tensions
- Authors/Creators
- S. Ledger (Author/Creator)C. Kawalilak (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol.21(4), pp.653-665
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Identifiers
- 991005541734507891
- Copyright
- © 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Education
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
55 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.11 Education & Educational Research
- 6.11.1255 International Education
- Web Of Science research areas
- Education & Educational Research
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general