Journal article
Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas, biofuel and biomass energy options within an arable crop rotation
Global change biology. Bioenergy, Vol.7(6), pp.1305-1320
2015
Abstract
Feed in tariffs (FiTs) and renewable heat incentives (RHIs) are driving a rapid expansion in anaerobic digestion (AD) coupled with combined heat and power (CHP) plants in the UK. Farm models were combined with consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA) to assess the net environmental balance of representative biogas, biofuel and biomass scenarios on a large arable farm, capturing crop rotation and digestate nutrient cycling effects. All bioenergy options led to avoided fossil resource depletion. Global warming potential (GWP) balances ranged from -1732kgCO(2)eMg(-1) dry matter (DM) for pig slurry AD feedstock after accounting for avoided slurry storage to +2251kgCO(2)eMg(-1) DM for oilseed rape biodiesel feedstock after attributing indirect land use change (iLUC) to displaced food production. Maize monoculture for AD led to net GWP increases via iLUC, but optimized integration of maize into an arable rotation resulted in negligible food crop displacement and iLUC. However, even under best-case assumptions such as full use of heat output from AD-CHP, crop-biogas achieved low GWP reductions per hectare compared with Miscanthus heating pellets under default estimates of iLUC. Ecosystem services (ES) assessment highlighted soil and water quality risks for maize cultivation. All bioenergy crop options led to net increases in eutrophication after displaced food production was accounted for. The environmental balance of AD is sensitive to design and management factors such as digestate storage and application techniques, which are not well regulated in the UK. Currently, FiT payments are not dependent on compliance with sustainability criteria. We conclude that CLCA and ES effects should be integrated into sustainability criteria for FiTs and RHIs, to direct public money towards resource-efficient renewable energy options that achieve genuine climate protection without degrading soil, air or water quality.
Details
- Title
- Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas, biofuel and biomass energy options within an arable crop rotation
- Authors/Creators
- David Styles - Bangor UniversityJames Gibbons - Bangor UniversityArwel P. Williams - Bangor UniversityJens Dauber - Thünen Institute of Biodiversity Bundesallee 50 38116 Braunschweig GermanyHeinz Stichnothe - Thünen Institute of Agricultural Technology Bundesallee 50 38116 Braunschweig GermanyBarbara Urban - Thünen Institute of Agricultural Technology Bundesallee 50 38116 Braunschweig GermanyDavid R. Chadwick - Bangor UniversityDavey L. Jones - Bangor University
- Publication Details
- Global change biology. Bioenergy, Vol.7(6), pp.1305-1320
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Number of pages
- 16
- Grant note
- AC0410 / Defra; Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
- Identifiers
- 991005560328507891
- Copyright
- © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Centre for Sustainable Farming Systems
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
3 File views/ downloads
32 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
- 3.87 Paper & Wood Materials Science
- 3.87.2131 Bioenergy
- Web Of Science research areas
- Agronomy
- Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
- Energy & Fuels
- ESI research areas
- Agricultural Sciences