Logo image
“Countability not answerability?” Accountability in Hong Kong and Singapore universities
Journal article   Peer reviewed

“Countability not answerability?” Accountability in Hong Kong and Singapore universities

J. Currie, L. Vidovich and R. Yang
Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Vol.28(1), pp.67-85
2008
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Singapore and Hong Kong are vying to be the principal educational hub for the Asia-Pacific region and have begun to compete with Australia, Britain, Canada and the USA in providing cross-border education. Although these four Anglo-American countries still dominate cross-border education, Singapore and Hong Kong hope to make inroads into this export market and compete on the global stage. To create "world-class" universities, Singapore and Hong Kong have introduced quality assurance mechanisms, diversified funding sources, and restructured their university governance systems. This article compares the accountability measures introduced into Hong Kong and Singapore universities, and the responses of academics and administrators to these measures. The results indicate that both countries introduced greater autonomy as they augmented accountability for their universities, and the term "decentralised centralism" describes the kind of government control exerted in these Asian universities in the twenty-first century.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.11 Education & Educational Research
6.11.1255 International Education
Web Of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image