Interest in the impact of disasters on conflict risks is burgeoning. This is particularly the case for the Indo-Pacific region, which is highly vulnerable to disasters and experiences geopolitical competition as well as several armed conflicts. So far, the literature has predominantly focussed on the impact of disasters on higher conflict risks. We argue that considering the option that disasters can (temporarily) reduce conflict risks would benefit research, politics, and practice. To illustrate this argument, we focus on two possible mechanisms. First, disasters can catalyse short-term declines in armed conflict intensity by providing constraints to the conflict parties. This mechanism is supported by evidence from the civil wars in Kashmir (after the 2005 earthquake) and Bangladesh (after cyclone Sidr in 2007). Second, disasters provide opportunities for diplomacy between states, which can in turn reduce conflict risks, even though such diplomacy might suffer from a politicisation of disaster relief. Evidence from Australian disaster diplomacy after the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake (Indonesia) and the 2022 volcanic eruption in Tonga supports this mechanism. A more comprehensive, less conflict-focussed ontology would benefit further research on disasters and conflict.
Details
Title
De-escalation and diplomacy: disasters as drivers of reduced conflict risks in the Indo-Pacific
Authors/Creators
Tobias Ide (Author) - Murdoch University, School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Ali Hayes (Author) - Murdoch University, School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Indah Larasati (Author) - Indo-Pacific Research Centre
Chloe Canavan (Author)
Publication Details
Australian Journal of International Affairs
Publisher
Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Number of pages
19
Grant note
Australian Department of Defence under the Strategic Policy Grants Program
This research was funded by the Australian Department of Defence under the Strategic Policy Grants Program.