Abstract
Aim
To develop a validated tool to measure nursing and midwifery documentation burden.
Background
While an important record of care, documentation can be burdensome for nurses and midwives and may remove them from direct patient care, resulting in decreased job satisfaction, associated with decreased patient satisfaction. The amount of documentation is increasing at a time where staff rationalisation results in decreasing numbers of clinicians at the bedside. No instrument is available to measure staff perceptions of the burden of clinical documentation.
Design
Survey development, followed by rwo rounds of content validation (April and May 2019).
Methods
Based on the literature a 28 item survey, with items in 6 subscales, representing key areas of documentation burden was developed. Item (I‐CVI), subscale (S‐CVI/Ave by subscale) and overall content validity indexes (S‐CVI/Ave) were calculated following two review rounds by an expert panel of clinical and academic nurses and midwives.
Results
Level of agreement for the first iteration of the survey was low, with many items failing to reach the critical I‐CVI threshold of 0.78. No subscale reached a S‐CVI/Ave above 0.8 and the overall scale only achieved a S‐CVI/Ave score of 0.67. Thirteen items were removed, seven were edited and five new items added, based on the expert panel feedback, substantially improving the content validity. All individual items achieved an I‐CVI ≥0.78, the S‐CVI/Ave was above 0.85 for all subscales and the total S‐CVI/Ave was 0.94.
Conclusion
The Burden of Documentation for Nurses and Midwives (BurDoNsaM) survey can be considered as content valid, according to the content validity analysis by an expert panel.
Impact
The BurDoNsaM survey may be used by nurse leaders and researchers to measure the burden of documentation, providing the opportunity to review practice and implement strategies to decrease documentation burden, potentially improving patient satisfaction with the care received.
