Logo image
Dialling in for breastfeeding success, a mixed-methods approach to explore remote stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the use of telehealth for lactation support
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Dialling in for breastfeeding success, a mixed-methods approach to explore remote stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the use of telehealth for lactation support

Kylie Ekin, Tarryn Sharp, Stuart Watson, Richard Norman, Kate Reynolds and Zoe Bradfield
Rural and remote health, Vol.26(2), 10046
2026
PMID: 42265557
pdf
Published1,006.09 kBDownloadView
Open Access CC BY V4.0

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology
Introduction: Breastfeeding has significant lifelong health benefits for mother and child that influence population health. Geographical spread and distance to health services can impact access to in-person lactation consultant services for women living in country Australia. Little is known about the acceptance of using telehealth to deliver lactation support to women living in rural and remote areas. The aim of this study was to investigate stakeholder perspectives of using telehealth to access or provide lactation consultant services through the Western Australian Country Health Service (WACHS) Lactation Consultant Telehealth Service (LCTS) and to explore the economic impact of using telehealth for clinical service delivery. Methods: This was a two-phase exploratory cross-sectional study with two key stakeholder groups: consumers who accessed the LCTS, and clinicians referring to and delivering the service. The first phase involved an online survey and the second phase involved short semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: A total of 57 consumers responded to the survey. The majority (89.5%) reported they received the support and information they required, 89.5% said they would access the LCTS again and over a third (39.3%) felt that they would not have continued breastfeeding if they didn't have access to the LCTS. Over three-quarters of respondents felt that the service enabled them to breastfeed their child for longer (78.9%). The mean estimated saving per woman using this LCTS was A$168. There were 24 clinician survey responses; all felt that the service was a good option for women living in remote regions and most (94.5%) felt they were able to help women by using the LCTS; however, 76.5% thought that a service delivered face-to-face would be more effective. Most agreed that the LCTS was better than no service at all but there was an expressed need for hybrid models. From the survey and interview qualitative data, two key themes were identified ('clinical service delivery' and 'service logistics and sustainability') and eight corresponding subthemes. Conclusion: The WACHS LCTS was able to meet the needs of majority of the regional, rural and remote women seeking support, and enabled women to breastfeed for longer. Findings have utility for service providers, policymakers and health leaders, providing new evidence of the benefits of LCTS in the largest (area) health service in the world. Limitations and gaps in evidence are highlighted, with recommendations for further inquiry.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs in the Output

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image