Logo image
Does genomic sequencing early in the diagnostic trajectory make a difference?  A follow up study of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Does genomic sequencing early in the diagnostic trajectory make a difference? A follow up study of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Zornitza Stark, Deborah Schofield, Melissa Martyn, Luke Rynehart, Rupendra Shrestha, Khurshid K Alam, Sebastian Lunke, Tiong Y. Tan, Clara L. Gaff and Susan M. White
Genetics in Medicine, Vol.21, pp.173-180
2019

Abstract

Purpose To systematically investigate the longer-term clinical and health economic impacts of genomic sequencing for rare-disease diagnoses. Methods We collected information on continuing diagnostic investigation, changes in management, cascade testing, and parental reproductive outcomes in 80 infants who underwent singleton whole-exome sequencing (WES). Results The median duration of follow-up following result disclosure was 473 days. Changes in clinical management due to diagnostic WES results led to a cost saving of AU$1,578 per quality-adjusted life year gained, without increased hospital service use. Uninformative WES results contributed to the diagnosis of non-Mendelian conditions in seven infants. Further usual diagnostic investigations in those with ongoing suspicion of a genetic condition yielded no new diagnoses, while WES data reanalysis yielded four. Reanalysis at 18 months was more cost-effective than every 6 months. The parents of diagnosed children had eight more ongoing pregnancies than those without a diagnosis. Taking the costs and benefits of cascade testing and reproductive service use into account, there was an additional cost of AU$8,118 per quality-adjusted life year gained due to genomic sequencing. Conclusion These data strengthen the case for the early use of genomic testing in the diagnostic trajectory, and can guide laboratory policy on periodic WES data reanalysis.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.189 Genome Studies
1.189.597 Genetic Testing
Web Of Science research areas
Genetics & Heredity
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image