Logo image
Double fold or double take? Book memory and the administration of knowledge
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Double fold or double take? Book memory and the administration of knowledge

T. Brabazon
Libri, Vol.52(1)
2002
pdf
double_fold_or_double_take.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The year 2001 will be known for many destructive and highly visible public tragedies. However within the librarian discourse, it will be remembered for the controversies encircling the publication of Nicholson Baker's Double Fold. This article assesses the rationale, direction and scope of this book and resultant debate, showing what it reveals about libraries, librarians and the distinctions between information and knowledge. Yet the article also suggests that Baker did not extend his case for preservation far enough: to the realm of popular memory, popular culture and digital ephemera. Without attention to these matters, libraries will remain neglected cemeteries: the passionless cranium of the culture.

Details

Metrics

605 File views/ downloads
74 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.303 Sociology
6.303.1915 Sociology Education
Web Of Science research areas
Information Science & Library Science
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image