Logo image
Effects of eye movement versus therapist instructions on the processing of distressing memories
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Effects of eye movement versus therapist instructions on the processing of distressing memories

C.W. Lee and P.D. Drummond
Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Vol.22(5), pp.801-808
2008
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The effectiveness of components of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) was tested by randomly assigning 48 participants to either an eye movement or an eye stationary condition and to one of two types of therapist instructions (reliving or distancing). Participants were university students (mean age 23) who were asked to recall a personal distressing memory with measures of distress and vividness taken before and after treatment, and at follow-up. There was no significant effect of therapist's instruction on the outcome measures. There was a significant reduction in distress for eye movement at post-treatment and at follow-up but overall no significant reduction in vividness. Post hoc analysis revealed a significant reduction in vividness only for the eye movement and distancing instruction condition. The results were consistent with other evidence that the mechanism of change in EMDR is not the same as traditional exposure.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Metrics

154 readers on Mendeley

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.24 Psychiatry & Psychology
6.24.93 Trauma and PTSD
Web Of Science research areas
Psychiatry
Psychology, Clinical
ESI research areas
Psychiatry/Psychology
Logo image