Logo image
Ex vivo comparison of three surgical techniques to stabilize canine cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifles
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Ex vivo comparison of three surgical techniques to stabilize canine cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifles

Lynne A Snow, Rick White, Scott Gustafson, Lin Xie, Giselle Hosgood, W Todd Monroe, John P Casey and Mandi J Lopez
Veterinary surgery, Vol.39(2), pp.195-207
2010
PMID: 20210967
url
PublishedView
Published (Version of Record)

Abstract

Animals Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery Dog Diseases - surgery Dogs Range of Motion, Articular Stifle - surgery Surgery, Veterinary - methods Suture Techniques - veterinary Tibia - surgery
Objective: To quantify and compare canine stifle stability after 3 stabilization techniques. Study Design: Randomized controlled study. Sample Population: Adult canine cadaveric pelvic limbs. Methods: Total craniocaudal (CrCa) tibial translation quantified in stifles with the cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) intact, transected, and stabilized with 1 of 3 techniques: (1) hamstring graft (HG); (2) modified retinacular imbrication (MRIT); (3) anatometric fascia lata translocation (AFLT). Tibial translation was quantified from radiographs generated during application of cranial and caudal forces to the tibia. After removal of all soft tissues except periarticular ligaments and fixation, CrCa tibial translation, as before, and medial–lateral rotation, via torsional loading, was quantified with an active motion analysis system. Total tibial translation was evaluated for effect of technique and cruciate status using mixed effect linear model with significance considered at P-value <.05. Results: CrCa translation was not significantly different across stabilization techniques with CrCLs intact, transected, or after stabilization. Poststabilization translation was significantly less than posttransection for all techniques. Compared with the intact CrCL, CrCa translation poststabilization after HG was significantly greater whereas poststabilization after MRIT and AFLT was not significantly different. Tibial rotation exceeded instrumentation limits in 62.5% HG limbs, 20% MRIT limbs, and 60% AFLT limbs. Conclusions: All 3 stifle stabilization techniques confer comparable CrCa translational stability after CrCL disruption with that provided by the MRIT and AFLT techniques comparable to the intact CrCL. Clinical Relevance: The extra- and intracapsular techniques evaluated in this study reduced CrCa tibial translation in CrCL deficient stifles to varying amounts.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.232 Veterinary Sciences
3.232.1715 Canine Orthopedics
Web Of Science research areas
Veterinary Sciences
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science
Logo image