Logo image
Examining the quality of phonological representations in Anindilyakwa children in Australia
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Examining the quality of phonological representations in Anindilyakwa children in Australia

J. Fletcher, J. Hogben, R. Neilson, R.D. Lalara and C. Reid
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Vol.50(6), pp.842-848
2015
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Background: In attempting to evaluate an intervention programme designed to improve English literacy outcomes in children in a remote indigenous community in Australia, the need for valid and culturally appropriate measures of the factors likely to impact on literacy development became apparent. One factor considered likely to be of importance was the precision of the children's phonological representations. Aims: To develop a measure of phonological representations that was culturally relevant for Anindilyakwa children and to evaluate its reliability and concurrent validity against English measures that are known to be predictive of literacy outcomes. Methods & Procedures: Starting from the Quality of Phonological Representations test (QPR), the authors developed an Anindilyakwa Quality of Phonological Representations test (AQPR) and examined its reliability and concurrent validity. Outcomes & Results: The AQPR was found to have acceptable reliability and to correlate significantly with three well-established measures of phonological awareness and phonics in English. Conclusions: The AQPR would thus seem an appropriate screening test for use by teachers to identify Anindilyakwa children in need of interventions to improve phonological representations before exposing them to an English literacy programme for which they may not yet be ready. The process involved in its development could be used by others working with indigenous students.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.69 Language & Linguistics
6.69.218 Reading Acquisition
Web Of Science research areas
Audiology & Speech-language Pathology
Linguistics
Rehabilitation
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image