Logo image
Further remarks on nondichotomization of graded responses
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Further remarks on nondichotomization of graded responses

D. Andrich
Psychometrika, Vol.60(1), pp.37-46
1995
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

I have tried to indicate not only the analytic differences in some of the points made in the paper and the rejoinder, but also the perspective from which these differences arise. The point of the paper, and these remarks, is to show how the special case of the MPM revealed why the joining assumption and dichotomization are not, in general, properties of the URM for graded responses, and, thereby to identify the circumstances where one would require that this property did not hold in empirical graded responses.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.73 Social Psychology
6.73.685 Item Response Theory
Web Of Science research areas
Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications
Psychology, Mathematical
Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods
ESI research areas
Psychiatry/Psychology
Logo image