Logo image
Healing Right Way: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Aiming to Enhance Quality of Life for Aboriginal Australian Survivors of Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Healing Right Way: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Aiming to Enhance Quality of Life for Aboriginal Australian Survivors of Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury

Elizabeth Armstrong, Tapan Rai, Judith M Katzenellenbogen, Sandra J Thompson, Meaghan McAllister, Natalie Ciccone, Deborah Hersh, Leon Flicker, Dominique A Cadilhac, Erin Godecke, …
The Australian journal of rural health, Vol.33(5), e70106
2025
PMID: 41131785
pdf
Published867.41 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

aboriginal clinical trial indigenous rehabilitation stroke traumatic brain injury
Objective To determine the effect of cultural security training (CST) for health professionals and access to an Aboriginal Brain Injury Coordinator (ABIC) for Aboriginal Australians with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial; the intervention package consisted of CST for hospital professionals and 6-month access to ABICs providing education, support, liaison and advocacy; the commencement order of the intervention phase was randomised. Setting Four urban and four rural hospitals in Western Australia, 2018–2022. Participants Aboriginal adults ≥ 18 years hospitalised with stroke or TBI. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcome was quality of life (Euro QOL–5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) score at 26 weeks post-injury. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Modified Caregiver Strain Index at 12 and 26 weeks, rehabilitation occasions of service, hospital compliance with minimum processes of care (MPC), acceptability of interventions, feasibility of ABIC role and costs. Results In total, 108 participants recruited (target 312), 75% rural residents; 26-week outcomes assessment completed for 78% of participants. The adjusted mean QoL showed no significant difference (p = 0.83). The MPC outcome favored the intervention group, adjusted difference in means 6.8% at 26 weeks, 95% CI (0.40%, 13.26%). There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups for other secondary outcomes. Conclusions CST and implementation of an ABIC were feasible, acceptable and improved care processes for a predominantly rural population. Health outcomes did not differ. The effects of the COVID-19 context are discussed. Trial Registration ACTRN12618000139279

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#10 Reduced Inequalities

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
6 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.156 Healthcare Policy
1.156.1502 Indigenous Health and Education
Web Of Science research areas
Nursing
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image