Logo image
How can ethnomethodology be Heideggerian?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How can ethnomethodology be Heideggerian?

A. McHoul
Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Vol.21(1), pp.13-26
1998
pdf
How_Can_EM_copy.pdfDownloadView
Author’s Version Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to begin to try to understand the extent to which ethnomethodology (EM) might be informed by some concepts and ideas from the work of the philosopher Martin Heidegger. This is done in two parts. The first looks at Heidegger's later work and compares his conception of the ontological difference with Garfinkel's work on the difference between EM and formal sociological analysis (FA). The second part turns to Heidegger's earlier work (around Being and Time) and works through a number of affinities between the analysis of Dasein and ethnomethodological versions of everydayness.

Details

Metrics

385 File views/ downloads
95 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.69 Language & Linguistics
6.69.610 Discourse Pragmatics
Web Of Science research areas
Ethics
Sociology
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image