Logo image
How do you think she feels? Vulnerability in empathy and the role of attention in school-aged children born extremely preterm
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How do you think she feels? Vulnerability in empathy and the role of attention in school-aged children born extremely preterm

C. Campbell, C. Horlin, C. Reid, J. McMichael, L. Forrest, C.R. Brydges, N. French and M. Anderson
British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol.33(3), pp.312-323
2015
pdf
How_do_you_think_she_feells.pdf361.78 kBDownloadView
Author’s Version Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine empathic competence in children born extremely preterm (EP, <28 weeks) given vulnerabilities in social relationships. Empathy in typically developing children is mediated by executive functions. Executive functioning is also impaired in preterm children. Of particular interest in this study are the attentional components of executive functioning as mediators of empathic development. Thirty-two 7-year-old EP children and 40 age-matched term children participated in the Project K.I.D.S program and completed the Kids Empathy Development Scale (KEDS), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV), and Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch). Children born extremely preterm exhibited poorer performance on all measures. The mediating role of attention in empathy competence was not supported by mediation modelling when FSIQ was controlled. As predicted, the EP group showed weaker empathic development relative to typically developing children. They also showed poorer attentional abilities. However, the effect of preterm birth on empathy was not mediated by executive-level attention. The cognitive mechanisms underpinning poor empathy competence in EP children remain unclear. Future research needs to examine the role of inhibition, social–emotional recognition, and regulation.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

297 File views/ downloads
123 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.72 Obstetrics & Gynecology
1.72.748 Neonatal Intensive Care
Web Of Science research areas
Psychology, Developmental
ESI research areas
Psychiatry/Psychology
Logo image