Logo image
How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation

Patricia Wilson, Elspeth Mathie, Fiona Poland, Julia Keenan, Amanda Howe, Diane Munday, Sally Kendall, Marion Cowe, Sophie Staniszewska and Claire Goodman
Journal of health services research & policy, Vol.23(2), pp.98-106
2018
PMCID: PMC5901416
PMID: 29653504
pdf
Published205.75 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

health research patient and public involvement and engagement realist evaluation
Objectives: To explore how embedded patient and public involvement is within mainstream health research following two decades of policy-driven work to underpin health research with patient and public involvement in England. Methods: Realist evaluation using Normalization Process Theory as a programme theory to understand what enabled patient and public involvement to be embedded as normal practice. Data were collected through a national scoping and survey, and qualitative methods to track patient and public involvement processes and impact over time within 22 nationally funded research projects. Results: In research studies that were able to create reciprocal working relationships and to embed patient and public involvement this was contingent on: the purpose of patient and public involvement being clear; public contributors reflecting research end-beneficiaries; researchers understanding the value of patient and public involvement; patient and public involvement opportunities being provided throughout the research and ongoing evaluation of patient and public involvement. Key contested areas included: whether to measure patient and public involvement impact; seeking public contributors to maintain a balance between being research-aware and an outsider standpoint seen as authentically' lay; scaling-up patient and public involvement embedded within a research infrastructure rather than risk token presence and whether patient and public involvement can have a place within basic science. Conclusions: While patient and public involvement can be well-integrated within all types of research, policy makers should take account of tensions that must be navigated in balancing moral and methodological imperatives.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.14 Nursing
1.14.724 Shared Decision Making
Web Of Science research areas
Health Policy & Services
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image