Logo image
How have COVID‐19 stringency measures changed scholarly activity?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How have COVID‐19 stringency measures changed scholarly activity?

K.M. Caudwell, A. Soranzo, L.W. Lim and L. Aquili
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol.1513(1), pp.5-9
2022
pdf
Published402.27 kBDownloadView
CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

Government restrictions to the movement of people due to the COVID-19 pandemic have had a wide range of effects on scientific activity. Here, we show that during the pandemic there has been a reduction in the number of registered non-COVID-19 clinical trials. Furthermore, using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker Stringency Index (SI) as an indicator of COVID-19–related workplace adjustment (e.g., restrictions on gatherings, workplace closures, and stay-at-home orders), we demonstrate that this drop in clinical trial registration has been greater in countries with a higher SI. This could have significant consequences for the discovery of treatments that are required to reduce the global burden of disease.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Metrics

46 File views/ downloads
34 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.14 Nursing
1.14.841 Gender Equity
Web Of Science research areas
Neurosciences
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image