Journal article
Impact assessment: Eroding benefits through streamlining?
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.45, pp.46-53
2014
Abstract
This paper argues that Governments have sought to streamline impact assessment in recent years (defined as the last five years) to counter concerns over the costs and potential for delays to economic development. We hypothesise that this has had some adverse consequences on the benefits that subsequently accrue from the assessments. This hypothesis is tested using a framework developed from arguments for the benefits brought by Environmental Impact Assessment made in 1982 in the face of the UK Government opposition to its implementation in a time of economic recession. The particular benefits investigated are ‘consistency and fairness’, ‘early warning’, ‘environment and development’, and ‘public involvement’. Canada, South Africa, the United Kingdom and Western Australia are the jurisdictions tested using this framework. The conclusions indicate that significant streamlining has been undertaken which has had direct adverse effects on some of the benefits that impact assessment should deliver, particularly in Canada and the UK. The research has not examined whether streamlining has had implications for the effectiveness of impact assessment, but the causal link between streamlining and benefits does sound warning bells that merit further investigation.
Details
- Title
- Impact assessment: Eroding benefits through streamlining?
- Authors/Creators
- A. Bond (Author/Creator) - University of East AngliaJ. Pope (Author/Creator) - Curtin UniversityA. Morrison-Saunders (Author/Creator) - North-West UniversityF. Retief (Author/Creator) - North-West UniversityJ.A.E. Gunn (Author/Creator) - University of Saskatchewan
- Publication Details
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.45, pp.46-53
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Identifiers
- 991005543171607891
- Copyright
- © 2013 Elsevier Inc.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Veterinary and Life Sciences
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
458 File views/ downloads
144 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.153 Climate Change
- 6.153.2227 Strategic Environmental Assessment
- Web Of Science research areas
- Environmental Studies
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general