Logo image
Infant removals: The need to address the over-representation of Aboriginal infants and community concerns of another ‘stolen generation'
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Infant removals: The need to address the over-representation of Aboriginal infants and community concerns of another ‘stolen generation'

M. O’Donnell, S. Taplin, R. Marriott, F. Lima and F.J. Stanley
Child Abuse & Neglect, Vol.90, pp.88-98
2019
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Objectives The removal of a child from their parents is traumatising, particularly in Aboriginal communities where a history of child removals has led to intergenerational trauma. This study will determine where disparities in child protection involvement exist among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children and characteristics associated with infant removals. Challenges faced by child protection and other agencies, and opportunities for overcoming these, are discussed. Methods Data from both the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and linked Western Australian government data was used to examine disparities between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children in the child protection and out-of-home care system. Results Nationally, Aboriginal children are ten times more likely to be placed in out-of-home care than non-Aboriginal children and this disparity starts in infancy. Infants were removed from parents with high levels of risk. Aboriginal infants were at increased risk of being removed from women with substance-use problems and had greater proportions removed from remote, disadvantaged communities than were non-Aboriginal infants. Conclusions Aboriginal infants have a high rate of removal. Although there are many complexities to be understood and challenges to overcome, there are also potential strategies. The disparity between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal infant removals needs to be seen as a priority requiring urgent action to prevent further intergenerational trauma.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.24 Psychiatry & Psychology
6.24.856 Child Welfare
Web Of Science research areas
Family Studies
Psychology, Social
Social Work
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image