Logo image
Institutional processes and the production of gender inequalities: The case of Australian child support research and administration
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Institutional processes and the production of gender inequalities: The case of Australian child support research and administration

K. Cook, H. McKenzie, K Natalier and L. Young
Critical Social Policy, Vol.35(4), pp.512-534
2015
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

child maintenance evidence-based policy separated parents social inequality welfare administration
This article analyses the administrative and research capture of child support data as a case study of how institutional data collection processes are performative in perpetuating gendered inequalities. We compare interviews with 19 low-income single mothers and their longitudinal survey responses from the same research to reveal how low-income women strategically or inadvertently ‘smoothed’ their experiences when responding to data collection processes. This directly resulted in material and symbolic costs in the form of reduced welfare benefits and limited evidence with which to lobby for policy reform. These processes in turn provided benefits to fathers and the state in the form of reduced child support liabilities and enforcement action, and welfare outlays, respectively. We conclude that current administrative and research data collection practices provide a limited and gendered evidence base for administrative justice and policy reform.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.178 Gender & Sexuality Studies
6.178.516 Family Fertility Dynamics
Web Of Science research areas
Social Issues
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image