Logo image
Back
International arbitration, the pacific settlement of disputes and the French security-disarmament dilemma (1919-1931)
Journal article   Peer reviewed

International arbitration, the pacific settlement of disputes and the French security-disarmament dilemma (1919-1931)

A. Webster
French History, Vol.24(2), pp.236-261
2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fh/crq029
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

International arbitration played an ambiguous role in French planning over national security during the years following the First World War, as policymakers faced the challenge of dealing with the powerful post-war movement in favour of international disarmament. It was a French-driven initiative in 1924 that accorded arbitration a central role as a means to ensure the pacific settlement of international disputes, yet policymakers in Paris remained for the most part convinced that arbitration on its own could never be certain enough to safeguard France. Though they would continue to support the cause of arbitration into the early 1930s, as a means to expand the powers available to the League Council, they rejected the idea that disarmament could follow from a mere increase of confidence or an ethos of goodwill. Disarmament could only follow from concrete measures to underpin security, namely commitments of military assistance against unprovoked aggression. These could be organized through the League or bilaterally, but they could not be substituted for by arbitration.

Details

Metrics

79 Record Views
4 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
10 Arts & Humanities
10.245 20th Century History
10.245.2007 World War
Web Of Science research areas
History
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image