Journal article
Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
Genes, Brain and Behavior, Vol.6(3), pp.299-303
2007
Abstract
In gene targeting experiments, the importance of genetic background is now widely appreciated, and knockout alleles are routinely backcrossed onto a standard inbred background. This produces a congenic strain with a substantial segment of embryonic stem (ES)‐cell‐derived chromosome still flanking the knockout allele, a phenomenon often neglected in knockout studies. In cholecystokynin 2 (Cckbr) knockout mice backcrossed with C57BL/6, we have found a clear ‘congenic footprint’ of expression differences in at least 10 genes across 40 Mb sequence flanking the Cckbr locus, each of which is potentially responsible for aspects of the ‘knockout’ phenotype. The expression differences are overwhelmingly in the knockout‐low direction, which may point to a general phenomenon of background dependence. This finding emphasizes the need for caution in using gene knockouts to attribute phenotypic effects to genes. This is especially the case when the gene is of unknown function or the phenotype is unexpected, and is a particular concern for large‐scale knockout and phenotypic screening programmes. However, the impact of genetic background should not be simply viewed as a potential confound, but as a unique opportunity to study the broader responses of a system to a specific (genetic) perturbation.
Details
- Title
- Interpretation of knockout experiments: the congenic footprint
- Authors/Creators
- L.C. Schalkwyk (Author/Creator)C. Fernandes (Author/Creator)M.W. Nash (Author/Creator)K. Kurrikoff (Author/Creator)E. Vasar (Author/Creator)S. Kõks (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Genes, Brain and Behavior, Vol.6(3), pp.299-303
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Identifiers
- 991005541625907891
- Copyright
- © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Murdoch University
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
35 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 1 Clinical & Life Sciences
- 1.5 Neuroscience
- 1.5.1511 Rodent Behavior
- Web Of Science research areas
- Behavioral Sciences
- Neurosciences
- ESI research areas
- Neuroscience & Behavior