Journal article
Interpreting understanding context
Journal of Pragmatics, Vol.25(3), pp.431-440
1996
Abstract
John Searle's (1977) objections, based in speech act theory, to Jacques Derrida's ‘grammatological’ or ‘deconstructive’ ideas about language, text and writing are well known — as are Derrida's (1977, 1978a, 1988) replies and, perhaps, Searle's responses (1983, 1994). More recently, however, Jeff Coulter (1994) in Journal of Pragmatics has launched a different criticism of Derrida, based in Wittgensteinian and ethnomethodological theory, and directed at what Coulter thinks of as Derrida's unduly indeterminate and interpretable conception of context. In this paper, we want to respond to some features of Coulter's criticism, to argue that it mistakes some of Derrida's arguments and, finally, to try to show that, if these (Derrida's) arguments are put properly, the differences between Derrida's and Coulter's positions can be slightly reduced.
Details
- Title
- Interpreting understanding context
- Authors/Creators
- C. Colebrook (Author/Creator) - Murdoch UniversityA. McHoul (Author/Creator) - Murdoch University
- Publication Details
- Journal of Pragmatics, Vol.25(3), pp.431-440
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Identifiers
- 991005543554307891
- Copyright
- 1996 Elsevier BV
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Humanities
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
Metrics
88 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.69 Language & Linguistics
- 6.69.610 Discourse Pragmatics
- Web Of Science research areas
- Language & Linguistics
- Linguistics
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general