Abstract
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) was originally introduced as a standardised, practice-based evidence tool for generating effectiveness data by practitioners within the context of routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) settings. Following wide application across UK NHS sites the CORE-OM has proven to be a pragmatic measure of both a) gross psychological distress and b) the effectiveness of psychotherapy interventions across client populations, presenting problems, clinical settings and therapy models. However in order for South Africa to benefit from this tool, the CORE-OM must be applicable within a South African context. This requires its validation within South African populations. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the cross-cultural validity of the CORE-OM, using a South African student population sample and in so doing to provide preliminary referential data for use in interpreting CORE-OM scores within English-medium, South African University student counselling centre contexts.
