Logo image
Is the human mind a Turing machine?
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Is the human mind a Turing machine?

D. King
Synthese, Vol.108(3), pp.379-389
1996
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the topics of mechanism and algorithmicity. I emphasise that a characterisation of algorithmicity such as the Turing machine is iterative; and I argue that if the human mind can solve problems that no Turing machine can, the mind must depend on some non-iterative principle — in fact, Cantor's second principle of generation, a principle of the actual infinite rather than the potential infinite of Turing machines. But as there has been theorisation that all physical systems can be represented by Turing machines, I investigate claims that seem to contradict this: specifically, claims that there are noncomputable phenomena. One conclusion I reach is that if it is believed that the human mind is more than a Turing machine, a belief in a kind of Cartesian dualist gulf between the mental and the physical is concomitant.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
10 Arts & Humanities
10.126 Philosophy
10.126.852 Metaphysics and Logic
Web Of Science research areas
History & Philosophy Of Science
Philosophy
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image