Logo image
Lamb age has little impact on eating quality
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Lamb age has little impact on eating quality

C.E. Payne, L. Pannier, F. Anderson, D.W. Pethick and G.E. Gardner
Foods, Vol.9(2), Article 187
2020
pdf
Lamb age has little impact on eating quality.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

There is an industry wide perception that new season lamb has better eating quality than old season lamb. This study aims to identify differences in consumer eating quality scores between two age classes in lamb. Consumer eating quality scores from eight cuts across the carcass were evaluated from new season (NS; n = 120; average age = 240 days) and old season lambs (OS; n = 121; average age = 328 days), sourced from four different flocks. Cuts were grilled (loin, topside, outside, knuckle and rump) or roasted (leg, shoulder, rack) and scored by untrained consumers for tenderness, juiciness, liking of flavour and overall liking. There was no difference in eating quality scores between the two age classes for the loin, leg, shoulder and rack. This was similarly shown in the topside with the exception of juiciness scores where NS lambs were higher than OS lambs. There was also a lack of age difference in the outside with the exception of flock 3 where NS lambs scored higher than OS lambs for all sensory traits. Across all sensory traits, OS lambs received on average 2.8 scores lower for the knuckle and 3.1 scores lower for the rump compared to NS lambs. These results show little difference in eating quality between NS and OS lamb, and highlight the potential to develop high quality OS or "autumn lamb" products, with a similar premium price at retail as NS lambs.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

undefined
#12 Responsible Consumption & Production

Metrics

34 File views/ downloads
109 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.51 Dairy & Animal Sciences
3.51.206 Meat Quality
Web Of Science research areas
Food Science & Technology
ESI research areas
Agricultural Sciences
Logo image