Logo image
Back
Living in the control society: Surveillance, users and digital screen technologies
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Living in the control society: Surveillance, users and digital screen technologies

K. Best
International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol.13(1), pp.5-24
2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877909348536
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Despite growing political and academic interest in increases in surveillance brought about by digital technology, users of these technologies themselves appear to remain relatively unconcerned with surveillance, accepting the trade-off of greater usability for decreased control. This article interrogates the contradiction between people's professed opinions and their actual behaviours, and the contradiction between public and academic discourse and people's everyday disregard. It does so by comparing a theoretical model currently in common use for analysing surveillance, focused around a Deleuzian conception of 'control society', with users' own perceptions about the relative harm of surveillance, using data drawn from a qualitative study. In this enterprise, the study seeks to advance David Lyon's call to understand whether and how users actually consent to surveillance in their everyday lives. The study finds two main points of difference and one point of commonality between control society analyses of surveillance and users' own perceptions and experiences of being surveilled. Whereas a control society analysis points to the increasingly simulated quality of much of the data being generated about 'dividuals', users themselves hold onto notions about the truth and reliability of that information. Whereas a control society analysis conceptualizes surveillance in terms of postmodern forms of control which are dispersed, slippery and leak into everyday practice, users profess an ability to target surveillance attempts within specific spaces and attached to particular information domains. Control society analyses and user experiences of surveillance do converge, however, around the third tenet emerging from this scholarship: the notion of participatory surveillance, and how consent is currently operationalized.

Details

Metrics

191 Record Views
58 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.185 Communication
6.185.1644 Digital Privacy
Web Of Science research areas
Cultural Studies
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image