Journal article
Long-term survival with unfavourable outcome: a qualitative and ethical analysis
Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.41(12), pp.963-969
2015
Abstract
Objective To assess the issue of ‘retrospective consent’ among a cohort of patients who had survived with unfavourable outcome and to assess attitudes among next of kin regarding their role as surrogate decision makers.
Methods Twenty patients who had survived for at least 3 years with an unfavourable outcome following a decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury were assessed with their next of kin. During the course of a semistructured interview, participants were asked whether they would have provided consent if they had known their eventual outcome. They were also asked for general comments regarding all aspects of the clinical journey. Eighteen patients had next of kin who were available for interview. For two patients, there was no longer any family involvement.
Results Of the 20 patients, 13 were able to provide a response and 11 felt that they would have provided consent even if they had known their eventual outcome. Of the 18 next of kin who were able to express an opinion, 10 felt that they would have provided retrospective consent.
Conclusions Many patients appeared to have adapted to a level of disability that competent individuals might deem unacceptable. This does not necessarily mean that such outcomes should be regarded as ‘favourable’, nor that decompressive craniectomy must be performed for patients with predicted poor outcome. Nevertheless, those burdened with the initial clinical decisions and thereafter the long-term care of these patients may draw some support from the knowledge that unfavourable may not necessarily be unacceptable.
Details
- Title
- Long-term survival with unfavourable outcome: a qualitative and ethical analysis
- Authors/Creators
- S. Honeybul (Author/Creator)G.R Gillett (Author/Creator)K.M. Ho (Author/Creator)C. Janzen (Author/Creator)K. Kruger (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.41(12), pp.963-969
- Publisher
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Identifiers
- 991005540837307891
- Copyright
- © 2014 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Murdoch University
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
19 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 1 Clinical & Life Sciences
- 1.134 Trauma & Emergency Surgery
- 1.134.286 Traumatic Brain Injury
- Web Of Science research areas
- Ethics
- Medical Ethics
- Social Issues
- Social Sciences, Biomedical
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general